Comments on a Danger to America
I want to share about a political and social philosophical point of view which is a danger to our country and, in fact, to the whole world. Its adherents do not see people for who they are at all. They see people as victims and as people who don’t need a hand but deserve a handout. They want to intervene and remove personal responsibility and perseverance in the face of adversity and challenges out of the equation. This philosophical perspective is that they see victims, as people who have going through life but never overcoming or growing out of what they have been through. In so doing, their idea of living is to never have anything bad happen to anyone but if something does they want to swoop in and, as if with a magic wand, obliterate the problem, erase consequences, and punish whoever they decide is the most culpable for causing the complication. They don’t appreciate what have I shared in various places - No matter the good or bad situation we grew up in, no matter the home life, the parents, family members, the choices we have made, all of what we have gone through is molding us into the people we are becoming.
Not only that, but the “leaders” of this philosophy see governments, and mainly, the United State and other humans as needing to evolve beyond our current state. For example, while I was doing the finally editing of this essay, I received an email from the President of the County Council in which I reside that sums up my point very well.
“Our County has grown and it has changed. These demographic patterns require us to be open and proactive in how we address the evolved needs of our residents….We have made progress, but we are still far from that ideal. In the meantime, we must do something.” Council President Nancy Navarro Council Update from June 19, 2019 Titled “A Message on Accessory Dwelling Units, Civility and Decorum in an Age of Change”
They want to remove some laws, add on more laws, and use social constructs to direct human behavior and mold people, society, and government into their idea of perfect humanness and society. They don’t see people as imperfect and sinful in a Christian way since they see religion with its morals and beliefs as a barrier to their aims.
With these core perspectives, the politicians at all levels of government, pass laws not to provide opportunities for people but to counteract what was written in the Declaration of Independence - “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men.” They want to be “God” and they want to be the ones to re-endow the rights and distribute the rights in such a way as to exploit and claim that they were the ones who intervened to ensure that these rights were correctly given out. They choose to ignore that Continental Congress recognized that God gave these rights out once already and that was sufficient. The writers and representatives in 1776 expressed these truths to Americans specifically but they wanted the whole world to know them, too.
Many today, have been taught and indoctrinated and now believe that Jefferson and others missed something. In their eyes, the Founding Fathers, were not educated enough or egalitarian enough in their 18th Century enlightened state, though they were educated at Harvard and elsewhere, but believe they did not have the fortitude to finish the task. According to them, the founded nation and the documents which established the government were flawed because they did not resolve everything that was wrong at the time especially when it came to slavery. However, that was not the only thing. Words like Creator, rights, equal, all men are limiting and they have issues with life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. They fail to see the Declaration of Independence was a starting place for launching the American Dream. They are kind of like legalists, like the Pharisees in the Bible, who had to have every law precisely spelled out instead of the flexibility and the freedom which this document offers. Although, the Declaration of Independence is not a legal document in that way this founding document was written to tell the world, Great Britain, and the colonists that they were being denied rights which they deserved and they were telling all that they were willing to fight the greatest country on earth at that time, risking their lives, their property, and sacred honor to achieve freedom so as to secure the 2denied rights. The Constitution was written to spell out the way the American government would enable people to exercise their rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. This is evidenced by the Preamble to the Constitution. “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
Their supporters and those influenced throughout society and especially, the elected ones, want to go to war on the government and society which they claim has denied people their rights. They believe that America failed to win the war in the late 1700s because they failed to obtain the guarantees of these rights for all. By its failure to distribute the rights properly, government blundered when, in fact, people were supposed to appropriate and use them without hinderance and in some cases, people were prevented from having freedom. They fail to recognize that government was established to secure the rights by the war that was fought so that Americans could then exercise these rights. They believe governments need to keep securing these rights and giving them again to people who were left along the wayside throughout our history. I will not deny that there were people in the last 250 years who were treated wrongly and some of the effects are still evident in America. At the same time, each of us today with our baggage should be able to move forward without elected politicians looking for each and every person who has not succeeded in participating in the American Dream and try to force the government and society to treat these found victims differently so somehow the Dream is more attainable for them.
The Supreme Court, made up of nine men in 1973, at the behest of feminist women, created a ruling out by wrongly applying the right to privacy which has taken away the life opportunities of 60 million babies. With their lockhold on what they call by many names - words like reproductive rights, a women’s right to choose, pro-choice have enabled legalized murder to fit their philosophy’s agenda. Women are again treated as a victims; responsible enough to have unprotected sex but denying them the consequences of their choice to do so by aborting the baby conceived by their actions. Considering that every act of sexual relations does not result in a pregnancy, that means they have been actually playing Russian roulette with their bodies in a very irresponsible way. They could have sex on 330 other days of the year but they choose to have sex on a fertile day. At the same time, there are men out in the world who don’t care about the consequences of their actions either and take advantage of the willingness and unwillingness of women and rape them, seduce them with words and convince them to have sex. Or as a relative tricking them into bed, or take up women on their offer to enjoy their bodies which results in a pregnancy. Then you have the group of women who go out looking to have sexual relations and once they are pregnant they believe their choice may expose their activities to the world and want to hide those consequences of having sex. There are all kinds of reasons and excuses - their boyfriend is the father, or it is a man not their husband, or that this pregnancy will prevent them from accomplishing what they had planned for their lives, or they cannot afford to raise a child right now, or would expose them to others who would judge them for having sex and not being responsible enough to not get pregnant. Whichever underlying action caused conception, a life was created. So many want to play “God” again and say that only certain lives deserve life- not the ones conceived but only the ones where the mother choose to give birth. Lately some have taken it a step further and said after the baby has been born they may not deserve to live. How evil! Victims or not, these pregnant women can eliminate from their bodies a baby and take away their right to life. Returning to responsibility, I was told by a teen that she believed that there should be age restrictions on buying a firearm. Her reasoning was that teens were not capable of making such an important decision like this. I postulated the idea that pregnant teens may not be capable of making a life and death decision when it comes to abortion either but she was not willing to accept the same argument that she had just made. At the same time, there are politicians who seek to restrict underage smoking and vaping using this same argument about health and responsibility but then they want to decrease the age of voting to 16. They cannot have it both ways - either teens are responsible for all of their decisions or none.
Another area where there is confusion is when it applies to our open borders and immigration, especially illegal immigrants. The rights which were stated above and revealed to the world in 1776, had a two fold exhibition. First, the signers wanted all to know that these rights were not just for Americans. People could come to America to live and be part of this “experiment” but where they currently lived, they were supposed to have these rights there too and their government was supposed to secure these rights for them. Instead, because governments around the world failed to accomplish this, illegal aliens are allowed to come in with offers of the same rights as citizens and they are provided sanctuary cities, benefits, education, and more so that they can enjoy these rights without becoming citizens until we can change the laws to automatically do so. As if we don’t already have enough “victims” of our own to deal with it is only right that we take the world’s as well and give them what they “deserve”. Personally, this is a slap in the face to all who are proceeding about getting their citizenship legally and are going through the correct process.
Sadly, liberty for so many does not mean freedom as an opportunity but freedom means doing whatever they want without regard for anyone else. It is a selfish perspective because for so many, liberty means freedom from consequences, freedom from restrictions, and freedom to take advantage of others. The original intent in the Declaration was that liberty meant that the government would not prevent you from doing things unless you were breaking the civil laws. Of course, we cannot forget that there were people not only indentured servants, but slaves at that time who were not free. That was part of the culture and society of the time and although there were people who recognized that slavery contradicted the words in the Declaration of Independence, defeating Great Britain was a higher priority at the time. (Jefferson had written words in the early draft related to slave ships, and Great Britain bringing slaves from Africa but they were removed before the final document was approved and voted on.) Many today believe the founding fathers were wrong in not granting slaves their liberty. However, they show their ignorance about what was happening in Congress. The southern colonies were not ready to give their slaves freedom at that time and would not have voted for independence. With a divided country, the War for Independence would have not been won and we would have remained British Colonies and the colonists would have been persecuted for the war and for striving for independence. In other words, the last 243 years of world history would not have happened. Most do not want to think about that, I think mainly because they want to impose their 21st Century perspectives on the past. This is always dangerous because they would not have this mindset if those 243 years had not happened.
“All men” did include women. They just did not add what so much of our legislation now includes a ridiculous number of inclusive terms so that all know they are not discriminated against. Because if it is not specifically written into the law, somehow that group of ignored people not mentioned 225 years ago, 150 years ago, 100 years ago, 50 years ago, or five years ago have rights which they did not have before. This again gets into the victimhood mindset. Maybe they did not have access to the rights or were denied the rights or people had not appropriated the rights but they did have them originally. It was later laws which were put in place which denied them rights which they were endowed with.
The Pursuit of Happiness is actually an unique phrase. It has a twofold meaning. For one, pursuing happiness refers to the acquiring of things and doing things to become personally happier but at the time it also, it refers to doing the greatest good for the greatest number. In other words, there are both personal opportunities and societal responsibilities for each citizen. One cannot be selfish with who we are and what we do with our lives. There are those who have decided that they have to intervene and make sure that everyone has what they believe is an equal playing field. That somehow that although one person living side by side growing up in the same place as another and one was made something of their life, the other person did not and it was society’s fault, government’s fault, the educational system’s fault, the parent’s fault, and therefore they need to step in and right this perceived inequity. This is part of the three hundred year old Plantation Mentality. There are those who believe that people are helpless without them, They view people as incapable of making decisions so they have to supply their every need because otherwise they are incapable of living without someone else’s assistance because they cannot accomplished or self improve on their own. There are two sides to this perspective. Politicians, especially, like to exempt themselves from this next thing. They persist in telling people that it is not their fault they are not successful in life because other factors have prevented them from achieving what they deserve. They again deny anyone personal responsibility or accountability for their failures due to wrong choices along the way or other factors which hindered success. By telling people they are victims of something or someone through not fault of their own, due to prejudice, discrimination, poverty, stigma, and the like they are able to convince people of their victimhood status. And they have gotten so much buy-in since they indoctrinate people by constantly parading the victims as examples or telling people their “neighbors” still are suffering and they need to be helped. But the corollary is this also, it denies personal responsibility for what one is able to do, when someone has overcome all barriers, odds, and other factors that they claim prevented others they will claim those have gamed the system, have cheated, had someone help them or they have others who contributed to achievements because they did not use the acceptable methods for overcoming the adversity to success. By categorically removing personal responsibility from the equation of life, everything that happens to someone is no longer their fault. This supports victimhood and along comes the do gooders in government - ready to step in and bail people out of whatever predicament they are in. So in holding to these beliefs, they are fundamentally against acknowledging anyone’s individual achievements because they believe like President Obama who kept promoting, that someone’s invention, pioneering endeavor, creative idea, or flourishing business or achievement was not accomplished independently but others enabled it to happen. Remember “ You did not build that.” That way, they can promote the village idea, it was a group effort, that someone in government assisted you, or another person did so that sole credit is not possible to claim. This is a direct attack on the whole foundational concept of rugged individualism and American Exceptionalism. They will attribute to luck, happenstance, or coincidence so that they can denigrate or diminish what was constructed or achieved.
As they reject American Exceptionalism, they actually promote and laud it in a backhanded way by not connecting the dots. By their ongoing willingness to accept any and all immigrants, especially illegal aliens from across the southern borders as refugees, they are actually saying that the originating country was not able to put in place a government that could secure the rights endowed by the Creator. They could not acquire the “dream” which Americans were able to secure so they had to leave their country to come here for the opportunity called American Exceptionalism.
In order for politicians to perpetuate their existence they need to keep finding new victims, new causes of victimhood so that can put them “on display” and explain how they deserve special treatment or privilege to overcome their victim status. They then stereotype, generalize, and exponentially project the one into many. However, once they have been supplemented with whatever is seen as “solving” their situation, they become the poster child for others in the same condition or as a stepping stone for the next cause.
We are supposed to not be able to think or act for ourselves or in our best interest. We need government’s guiding hand, help, assistance, or notoriety. If we deviate, make a mistake or screw up, governments are there to minimize the damage and our responsibility or lack thereof. Government needs to protect us from ourselves, others, and the other political party because we are not capable of doing so.
According to this philosophy, governments know what is good for you so they have to suppress or negate anything which promotes any outside interference, especially God, Christianity, hope, divine guidance, and definitely, Jesus as the Savior. They want to make sure that government is seen and understood to be the sole provider, the sole source, and administrator of meeting people’s needs. That way, people look not at themselves, their neighbors, their church, their family, or God but only government. They are trying to create a utopia and replace God in our lives. They are power hungry so they can implement this so they can be worshipped.
I won’t deny there are victims in our country who have been through all kinds of problems, circumstances, abuse, and other issues but they can be overcome, they can be dealt with, accepted and people can move past them but this group wants people to stay in this quicksand. For example, to say that misogyny, is the cause of all of women’s problems, that men are evil, unless they support feminist principles is shortsighted. It is creating stereotypes and worse, creating a schism between the genders and, most especially, creating a huge problem of ambiguity and dysfunctionalism in society and for children growing up without strong role models in their own homes to patterns their lives after.
They are so caught up in the quagmire of their own dogma they cannot see the contradictions and illogic of their positions. Many are quite willing to abort a child due to inconvenience about 95% of the time. (They would call them a pregnant woman which leads to the question which no one wants to acknowledge - if they are pregnant - it is not a ball of cells but a baby, otherwise they would be pregnant with a ball of panda cells, dog cells, fish cells, or some other animal. No, it is called a pregnancy test for a reason - one for human beings. It has to be human cells, a fetus, a growing child, a developing baby otherwise it is a cancer growth that needs to be removed, which is a way some view their condition. Oh, that must be what they happens after someone has sex with a boy/man during a fertile time of the month without protection. So someone did fail their sex ed class because they did not learn what would happen when sperm and egg come together after intercourse.) Confusion arises when they are willing to kill, execute, destroy an “innocent” baby who has not done anything other then be conceived as a result of a sexual act by choice or not but which gets in the way of someone’s future plans, or prove they were having sex as a result of incest, rape, or choice by stupidity, irresponsibility, adultery, to get pregnant. However, for the many who are in favor of capital punishment for the unwanted children, they are against the same act being done to someone who has committed a capital offense worthy of death. Someone who has done unspeakable crimes and has been judged as worthy to die by a jury of peers cannot die because we should not execute criminals. One argument is that we may execute someone accidentally for a crime they did not commit. Wow, what about the babies? They did not commit a crime in themselves, but one could claim the parents might have, so why should the baby be executed by the choices made by the egg and sperm donors?
What is sad is that this dogma has so permeated society, it is hard to find people who have not been infected by it, who are not articulate enough to counteract the arguments and the scenarios which they keep constantly launching into the discussions. Some of us try to get out the message but so many are like frogs in a simmering pot of water and they are being boiled and they do not realize they need to hop out of the pot before it is too late. Escape is possible, so think carefully but leap out.
Just because your mom took drugs you were not able to grow in the best of homes, or because of your economic situation, your school was not the best, or the alcoholic father, or skin color, abusive relative, or where you grew up was not idea; these are only circumstantial and environmental situations which plenty of people have survived and thrived. Those who want to use these as excuses for you. It is because you did not fight back hard enough so society owes you a better deal. Society owes you for what may have prevented you from excelling but even in what could be considered ideal you may not have been the best or the brightest. If they can convince you that you did not get what you think you deserved then you are a victim and one they can exploit. They locate one or more people and create a hypothetical scenario to prove their argument but it really holds no water but they are able to convince a slew of gullible people of the truth of their perception. Yet they have the nerve to call all kinds of people that they are ignorant, misinformed, are clinging to guns and their Bibles so they must be hicks, or Deplorables. They do their best to suppress any and all by ridicule, by oppression, or any other method to destroy the credibility of anyone promoting opposition and alternate perspectives.
Other issues promoted include restricting free speech. In so doing, they seek to restrict others’ rights to share an alternative perspective. Tolerance used to mean that you could listen to and discuss ideas, beliefs, and theories with others but today, those that want to claim they are tolerant are horribly intolerant and seek to shut down anything which threatens their core values. In cases like this, I believe they are scared that they cannot stand against an onslaught so they don’t want anyone to question their passionate beliefs so they do not have to defend them against those who disagree. Knowing their argument is very shallow, they tend to attack the other person so the alternative ideas are blocked from being heard. Calling someone’s argument or opposing point of view as racist, bigoted, homophobic, misogynistic, reveals their intolerance. They want to silence voices of dissent so they can champion the voices of the victims.
When it comes to race history, there is an interesting fracture. Southern Democrats fought for the Confederacy and even though Amendments to the Constitution promoted another view but they still did not believe former slaves and their descendants were capable of living out of bondage so they enacted Jim Crow Laws in the South, which the Supreme Court allowed in many cases, to subjugate them as being inferior and limit their opportunities to pursue life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. They did not want descendants of slaves to go to schools with white people, they fought against Civil Rights in the 1960s. Welfare was distributed and the public housing built created more dependency and inner city social issues which are still in evidence and the consequences have affected multi-generations. Now the there are is a plan to penalize all for what was done with reparations and to solve the issues created by the Plantation Mentality. This is one reason, the past is to be obliterated, ridiculed, maligned, or rewritten so there is less for people to study and by removing the monuments so to minimize the discussions about who is to blame. However, they want the government and other bodies to pay for it when it was the Democratic Party which enslaved blacks, held them down, and prevented them from pursuing life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Why should those in the North and the descendants of those who fought the Civil War against the South or today’s population of people who were not even in this country 150 years ago be held responsible for something they were not even involved in? In reality, it is just one more instance where there are victims to find and fund.
Colleges have transformed from institutions of learning, debating and questioning to places where snowflakes can be indoctrinated. A whole society has been reeducated. By encouraging and making it so “easy” to go to college they taught millions of students into a way of thinking which is false because they have silenced the one institution that for hundreds of years was the spot where alternative political and social concepts, principles were discussed and debated. Now, an outside speaker with conservative political or religious perspectives is not allowed on campus or protested to silence. Free speech is allowed only when it supports the “right” philosophy and any alternative point of view is not tolerated and is shouted down as intolerant to the victims which they champion.
Climate change is promulgated as fact and man caused, for sure, so they can control people’s lives in all they do. They want to take away guns from those who oppose them because they recognize that they cannot win if there is ever an armed Civil War over values which they want to be decide on. Science is their mechanism to prove their rightness except when it comes to morality. They don’t want to use it to verify when life begins so they can continue to support abortions. They refuse to use it when it comes to gender identity because they can champion victimhood stance while slapping in the face girls and women over bathrooms and girls in sports. DNA decides whether one is a man or a woman but they do not want go there. If a student has a DNA test when getting a doctor’s permission to participate in a sport that would determine which sex identity they are before they play. Consider how the Olympics would be affected by the whole gender identity arguments. However, forcing everyone to get a DNA test to solve gender identity would be a violation of people’s rights or so it would be said. How can they support women’s rights - like the #MeToo movement, women’s equality in pay when there is another victim to promote?
This social and political agenda is dangerous because they glom onto any victim which aligns with their philosophy. If they can determine their victim’s situation was caused by someone or something they are against, it is golden for their purpose. Any victim they accept needs to be elevated for the cause. Pro-choice women stand vehemently for their choice to abort but don’t support those choose life. Just check out all of the protests against Pro-lifers. Instead allowing for diversity and tolerating an opposing perspective, pro-abortionists verbally abuse those who threaten their philosophy.
Money is no object for this philosophy since they believe they can hit up the rich which they attack for their wealth, claiming they exploited others to become so. They ignore the fact that many of their own have become rich having done so by exploitation. Many politicians complain about the rich who earned their wealth through capitalism, even though, while working in the government, they have somehow multiplied their wealth into millions of dollars while in office. The National Debt is not an issue for them because there is not any desire to restrain spending or seek to reduce this shackle on everyone.
By controlling actions, they believe they can control society. They are trying to create a utopia by take on every cause where there is a possible victim. They indoctrinate by using phrases like common sense and comprehensive to establish buy-in and in so doing imply that everyone who disagrees with them must be an idiot or uneducated or does not want to solve the problem. The line from far above is a catch phrase - “we must do something” really is one of their mantras. They point out a problem and then suggest a “fix” which only makes the problem a perpetual one, that they can claim continually will need more money to resolve.
In many areas, they are not able to come to a workable solution. For example, when it to comes to mass shootings and Inner city crime, they have no productive answers so they want to restrict guns for all, at least the ones they can identify, so they can claim they are doing something but this does not to control the choices made by a few who possess firearms illegally and commit crimes. By their rejection of personal responsibility for one’s actions and that people can do evil things, they can never understand how anyone can kill others with guns. Again, they miss that their philosophy which has led to millions of babies being killed out of expediency because they have obtained public buy-in and have gotten the laws to change which allows for this. Contradiction and illogic are in evidence but not to them.
By insisting that everyone is equal they are denying the uniqueness and those with special abilities and skills. They use this same mentality in their educational practice of having no winners, no class rank, pass/fail, trans vs. girls sports. Ever notice that more males are identifying as females. How many trans are identifying as males so they can be successful in male dominated sports? I have not heard of any recently. I commend girls who want to play football, they are not letting their biological gender stop them from competing with and against boys. If someone really wants to push the envelope and bites the hand that feeds them, just wait until a trans individual, takes the gender role in a Hollywood movie or Broadway show and gets nominated for an award as the best female or male. That would be the same as a girl being pushed out of their sport by a trans individual competing in a women’s sport; however, I think they know not to do so.
They support the creation of fantasy worlds and people are swept up into the philosophical narrative because it creates doubt about the current worldview but it gives them an opportunity to suggest that unless you go along with them, this is what the world is coming to.
They imply happiness is not obtainable unless they are involved but they tend to be the most unhappiness of people.
They will manipulate, humiliate, or intimidate in order to force their opposition to backdown by claiming they are fear mongering which is what they do constantly, themselves.
By denying God’s existence they can focus on the here and now and promote their solutions to America’s problems. By denying creation, they can promote their doctrine that man can evolve himself with their help into utopia. They try to appropriate the Christian application principles of love and compassion so as to make their actions for palatable.
Becoming as a god, believers in this political and social philosophy offer a false hope as they offer “solutions” to respond to their victimhood and, at the same time, create more victims in the process. As they claim, there is victimhood, they claim their response will work, despite years of governmental and societal intervention by people trying to fix a particular problem. They are always quite willing to identify a need that they believe should be fixed by them.
However, they fail critically to get their adherents to obey even the simplest of principles and become hypocrites. For example, they constantly hold protest marches, while claiming how pro-environment they are, yet they leave tons and tons of trash behind and expect the government at taxpayer’ expense to clean up what they littered.
============
If you have not identified the philosophy which has been described for many paragraphs and words, let me clue you in. It is the Liberal Progressives who are using the means and methods chronicled above to destroy this country by every way possible.
Their philosophy for governmental and societal action is portrayed as the best way to solve America’s problems by evolving society to go along with their beliefs. Yet as been illustrated above, this is nothing more than an insidious evil which has indoctrinated many people, portions of society, and local, state, and the federal governments. Its leaders and many adherents see themselves as superior to others in their knowledge, beliefs and actions by being altruistic, helpful, empathic, and concerned for others less fortunate. Unfortunately, so many people do not recognize the tentacles and threads which have permeated our world and our country at all levels. Fortunately, there are others who are not so mindless and by continuing to win elections in the right states, the Electoral College has protected America, in several elections from indulging into their false utopia. However, with people leaving New York City and other taxed to the max locations, they are infiltrating states where their numbers can change the political alignments and push the United States over the brink. In so doing, they will be able to pass the laws which they have wanted to put in place for over a 100 years and change the Constitution into their image, forcing compliance on all who disagree.
In their efforts to enforce their version of equality for all, they believe that majority vote is the answer, which is why they want to get rid of the Electoral College. They refuse to recognize that the tyranny of the population is what the Founding Fathers were preventing with this arrangement. These wise men created a mechanism by which a most populated state/s could not subjugate the other states and nullify the votes of their population. Liberal Progressives want to use the majority vote as well so that 1-5% of the knowing ones know what is best for the rest of the country. It helps also when it comes to elections when the party or group which gets the most people to vote their way, even when only 30% of the population votes at all. In this example, 16% of those who vote can tell the other 84% what they can do.
The end result is that the victims which they have now created by their democratic rules and laws will be helped in a different way. Even those who are not Christians in America, have a foundational and moral code that disagrees with their philosophy and they will fight back. However, using government as their instrument of enforcement, those who disagree will be collected, if they are not killed, and sent to training. They will go to places where they will be shown the true way - via thought transformation. There is a contradictory hypocrisy going on, those having conflicts with gender identity cannot be sent off to be “reprogrammed” but this will be done to the non-adherents for the sake of all. Once in charge, Liberal Progressives will transform society into what they want, they will push towards the One World government predicted in the Bible, and having America in hand, they can move onto other countries.
I hope my dire perspective and predictions are wrong for the future but I believe it is only a foregone conclusion that this will happen. The evil one behind it all, the unseen one who has his hands everywhere and is manipulating the worldview to his ways. He seeks to blind the world to his actions. He distracts with sports, social ills, diseases, entertainment, fake and lost causes, television, video, college, career, pornography, seeking after wealth, sex, pleasure, and some many other human actions. He fights God but he cannot win but he will take many down to destruction with him. Wake up, America and resist! Otherwise, that knock on the door will be them coming to take you away.
